• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s pretty cut and dry that the original Zionists were anti-yiddish anti-Communist anti-semites that allied with prominent anti-semites against diaspora in order to pursue their settler-colonial project, which the Nazis gleefully worked for.

      • Drop Bear@theblower.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think you’ll find that all of the “original Zionists” were Christian @GarrulousBrevity
        What we now call “Zionism” grew after the Protestant Reformation, and is rooted in 17th-century English Puritanism.

        It had two significant streams:

        1. the return of Jews to Palestine (basically, a way to rid Europe of its Jews - a form of antisemitism, a couple of centuries before that term was coined);
        2. the second coming of Jesus (Jews who want to survive don’t remain Jewish).

        At the time, Jewish communities weren’t impressed. In the 19th century, Herzl and his friends exploited the movement to their own ends.
        @Cowbee

        #Israel
        #Palestine
        #Zionism

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes, antisemetic Jewish people living in different countries deliberately spreading antisemetic lies that they can’t integrate and need an ethnostate. The fact that they were Jewish doesn’t make settler-colonial genocide “not cut and dry.”

        • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          So, your argument that it’s not complicated is that Israel was founded by antisemitic Jews? I’m not even saying that you’re factually wrong, but you keep insisting that this isn’t complicated. It is complicated, and the more you insist that it’s simple, while giving increasing amounts of fine details is not particularly convincing