• Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “People don’t trust autonomous vehicles for safety, security and privacy concerns, so instead of fixing these issues, let’s put some googly eyes on them!” galaxy brain explodes

    …seriously tho, which kind of genius exec thought that this was a good idea? Do they think the Uncanny Valley is a spa resort or whatever?

  • vsg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    It looks like a sentient vehicle from some 90s/2000s TV show for little children.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It might work better if the car’s “face” was cuter. I mean, imagine if it looked like this when the car “noticed” you:

    Image

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if it’s a crosswalk with a bunch of people crossing at the same time? Which person would it make eye contact with? Would it rapidly change eye contact with a bunch of people?

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re watching a crosswalk with a bunch of people crossing at the same time, who do you look at, hmm?

      • PickTheStick@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I just use a value ranking system and rapidly sort variables until I reach the highest possible value.

        Women>Men

        Pop colors > blending (red is greater than brown, etc.)

        Interesting features > bland (So a dude with a scar registers higher than a dude without)

        Anomalies > expecteds (a top hat is more interesting than a ball cap)

        There’s probably some other minor variations that account for my choices. Thinking about it, the preference for women may be due to them having more eye-catching variables than men in most cases, especially with regards to color and accessories.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Forgot about this comment and came back to a paragraph long comment where the line “Women>Men” popped out to me. My first thought was “Oh no, what political thing did I comment on this time?”

          Anyways, thanks for the tip. Let’s make the automated vehicles prioritize staring at women and anyone who dares to stand out.

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I imagine people’s eyes flick around taking in everything. Which is normal for a human, super weird for anything mechanical.

    • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It uses the same priorities as when it’s deciding who to save and who to run down in an unavoidable collision. As to how it determines that, what do you think all those trolley problem memes were for?

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I’m walking or biking in front of a car stopped at an intersection it’s nice to have confirmation that the driver has seen me and isn’t going to press on the gas the moment I’m in front of the vehicle because they didn’t realize I was there, so a robotic equivalent of this would be actually useful.