• sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    As they should. I hope they burn all data and figure out a way to function going forwards without storing any data

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Or they could just store the data locally on the user’s device and not transmit it back to a central server, such that the company never even has possession of the data nor any way to retrieve it? Like I get it would require a major rewrite if they weren’t already doing this, but at least they’d be keeping their users safe while also having no way for authorities to gain any data.

      • pbjamm@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        concerns anti-abortion state laws could allow phone searches for menstrual data

        If the police search your phone then that would not protect you.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not necessarily. If you trust the code running on your device then there is no backdoor they could install on a server that would break e2ee. They would have to backdoor the client where the keys are.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          True, unless it’s open source and maybe self hosted.

          Edit: Nevermind, I’m right, I have no confidence in my own intelligence lol. If the key is on the phone and the phone stores the encrypted data to the server, that’ll be secure