macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]

  • 13 Posts
  • 187 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 29th, 2023

help-circle



  • Not viable. It’s a vulgar materialist misunderstanding of Marxism. Class consciousness and material conditions tend to develop in concert, i.e. dialectically, but class consciousness doesn’t automatically develop in response to changing material conditions. Otherwise we could sit back and let the revolution plan itself. I think socialists should lead struggles, tailored to the current material conditions, for things that will help the working class in the short-term while also making the possibility of a better, socialist, world feel more realistic in order to build class consciousness. If we’re leading efforts to make things worse for working people, why the hell would working people become socialists?

    Besides, it’s not clear that the left has the power to “do” accelerationism anyway. Vote for trump? What would it matter, there’s probably a thousand active socialists tops in each major city.




  • transcript from 99% invisible with details

    Roman Mars: The architects in Harry Weese’s group were tickled by the prospect as well.

    Dan Weissman: Jack Hartray, who worked on the building, said-

    I think everybody in the office figured that you had a certain number of unindicted criminals in the city and then you had some that had gotten caught.

    Dan Weissman: And the MCC was just for the people who happened to have gotten caught.

    Roman Mars: And because the architects took it seriously that the inmates were innocent until proven guilty, they thought-

    Dan Weissman: Let’s make this as nice as we can! You know, somebody already looked at this problem: how do you make a really small space cozy?

    Jack Hartray: Harry sort of viewed this from the standpoint of the accommodations on sailor boats. The furniture was all built-in, so you could really do pretty nice furniture.

    Dan Weissman: Built-in, hardwood furniture has these really clean lines. The bed, there’s a desk. I’ve seen this picture, it’s really, you know, it’s nice.

    Jack Hartray: We built rooms to scale in our office and my children used to come down and take naps. They loved the interior space. It was, you know, kind of intimate and pleasant.

    Dan Weissman: It was cozy.

    Jack Hartray: Yeah.

    Roman Mars: And those narrow, slit windows I mentioned earlier? Those are floor-to-ceiling windows, to let in as much light as possible. But they’re also built just narrow enough, at five inches, so that they were within the federal guidelines of the time to not need bars.

    Dan Weissman: Sounds really nice.

    Jack Hartray: Oh, it is nice! It’s not a bad place to stay.

    Dan Weissman: I saw an interview with Harry Weese where he said that what he had in mind was like a hotel.

    Jack Hartray: Well, we were doing a hotel at the same time and this was better than the hotel, as far as the built-in furniture and all that.


    Roman Mars: Phil Carrigan has been going to the MCC for over ten years.

    Dan Weissman: He is kind of the designated volunteer for the MCC, and he goes and visits guys who don’t have anyone else to visit them.

    Phil Carrigan: MCC is not a star. It’s very drab. Gunmetal gray. You know, the physical facility is nothing to show off.

    Dan Weissman: The cells, the architect described them as being very nice, with all this kind of hardwood, built-in furniture, for instance.

    Phil Carrigan: They’re gone. The bunks are steel, two-tier structures. No wood.

    Dan Weissman: And do you have sunlight coming in?

    Phil Carrigan: No. The windows are frosted. Doesn’t allow for sunlight to come in. And you know, the place is old. It’s definitely undergone some changes, but none of them have been for beautification.








  • What does it mean to “believe” in something you can’t observe or understand? There’s a sort of frontier where you make observations, form and test theories, and grow to understand the observations. We agree that crank theories, without evidence and unable to prove anything, are indistinguishable from the supernatural. So what good does it do us to consider them? We should explore things within the frontier - does infrasound cause ghost sightings? if so, does that summon ghosts or change the brain? - on a materialist basis, like some of the fringe scientists are trying to do. Invisible teapots that humans will be able to see in 3000 years should be dismissed as idealism.


  • $1200 is in the insurance range! I bought dental insurance for wisdom teeth extraction (surgical). $60/m, off the top of my head it will pay out 70% of the operation up to $2.5k a year. The yearly maximums don’t go much higher than that. Extractions will still cost me a couple hundred bucks but much less than sticker price. But to prevent people gaming the system like I am and buying insurance only after they develop problems, they have a waiting period of 6 months before you can use it. You should see if the dental school accepts insurance and start shopping for plans.


  • Materialism means we believe in a world that exists independent of our observations. This external world is in dialogue with people. There is not some kind of third thing that’s not in the world, not in the people, and fundamentally unobservable/unknowable, like God or souls or woo in general. (See Engels on agnosticism in Socialism Scientific & Utopian.) Either these things are real material phenomena, in which case we can use science to analyze ghosts or whatever, or they’re not. There is room in a materialist worldview for like, cryptids, but most “parapsychology” is stuff that requires discarding huge chunks of knowledge. For instance premonitions violate causality. If you give that up, what’s left to be materialist about?




  • i feel like this would be solved without sex work with better coordination mechanisms and destruction of patriarchy. There’s few people inexperienced/annoying/unattractive enough that you couldn’t find some other inexperienced/annoying/unattractive person to pair off with. Right now they don’t because

    1. sucks to use an app mostly full of hot people that don’t like you, so they leave
    2. objectification of women means men “get” something from sex; sex for pleasure is a labor parallel to sex for reproduction. Hence highly-gendered sex work for hundreds of years
    3. there are more male “bad partners” than female because of socialization under patricentricity. this means no-strings sex is dangerous for women

    So sexless men search and find nothing (or resort to economic coercion) and sexless women don’t search. We see healthier sex “economies” under socialism, e.g. GDR. I think that when people can fuck without getting stalked or hurt they will do so freely.