Environmental campaigners have called on the government to learn from its own successes after official figures showed the use of single-use supermarket plastic bags had fallen 98% since retailers in England began charging for them in 2015.

Annual distribution of plastic carrier bags by seven leading grocery chains plummeted from 7.6bn in 2014 to 133m last year, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said on Monday.

  • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminder that the biggest by far source of micro plastic in the air we breathe comes from tires. And there is zero research being done to find an alternative

      • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but synthetic textile is very broad and can be many products across different industries. A tire is an end product and if you find an alternative for that, you knock off the most contributing product of micro plastic.

      • mayonaise_met@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Metal tires and metal roads. Kind of slippery, so we might need to make some sort of ridges to guide our vehicle’s direction. Stopping will still be hard, but if we just lock cars together and do it all at once it might be feasible.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I see your from feddit.nl, which makes your comment make sense, but you really need to realize that in many places in the world, the way the town’s and cities were built, it’s just impossible to implement public transit, and biking isn’t really an alternative.

          Or places where public transit is a thing, it is really inconvenient.

          My girlfriend can drive to work in 30 minutes. Taking the bus takes her over an hour. So instead of a 1 hour drive each day, she’s on the bus for 2.5 hours + waiting + the inconvenience of the buses not being on schedule + the buses shutting down at midnight

          It’s great if you can commit an extra 1.5 hours every day just to sit on a bus, but she can’t. Not to mention that’s just going to work. If she needed to stop by for groceries, pet food, doctors appointments, etc, she’s adding an insane amount of time in between by having to switch buses.

          I know cars are bad, but going to work + running errands legit wastes a good 3+ hours vs taking a car. That’s a massive chunk of wasted time. She has shit she needs to do at home, she can’t spend a quarter of her day sitting on public transit.

          • treefingers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imagine if the public transport system wasn’t rubbish and your girlfriend could travel in the same 30 minutes?

            Public transport isn’t the problem, it’s the solution

            • pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Really depends where you are how feasible it is. Where I live we have a great public transport system. Most stations can be reached within 10 minutes when walking and there’s a tram leaving the station every 10 minutes. So getting anywhere in the city is fairly quick and wait times are mininal in most cases.
              Travel outside the city and it’s a whole different story and unfortunately there isn’t really a good way to fix it. Just increasing the frequency of busses/trains isn’t feasible because 90% of the rides will be empty at this point which makes no sense.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay. I’ll tell my city to just tear down half of it so they can build a better system.

              Like I said, not all towns and cities were designed for it. It’s not something you can just plop in centuries down the road. The world doesn’t work that way.

              Any new development should have public transit in mind. Old development can’t really be retrofitted. It’s like you missed my entire comment.

              • Vii@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In many places the cities were retrofitted for car centric infrastructure already, why couldnt it happen again?

              • median_user@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Car-centric cities waste tonnes of space on parking which sits empty most or all of the time. Improving them requires less knocking stuff down and more filling in the gaps.

                Luckily your city doesn’t have to pay for this - since property developers will do it for you to make money for themselves. You just need to fix the regulatory barriers: remove parking minimums and legalise mixed-use zoning.

                If you want to accelerate the process, your local government can adopt the Japanese model: build rail or light rail and then develop dense areas around or above it. This is generally profitable but requires taking on a decent amount of initial risk.

                So it can be done. But sitting around grumbling about how a better future is impossible because everything has to stay how it is right now won’t get us there.

                • Polar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So it can be done. But sitting around grumbling about how a better future is impossible because everything has to stay how it is right now won’t get us there.

                  Conveniently ignoring the part where I said new developments should absolutely have public transit in mind.

          • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You just described how bad the public transport where you live is, not why it can’t be better. We 100% can and should be building better public transport & active transport, as well as building places with better land use for these.

          • mackwinston@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then your (presumably Canada) country needs to start re-doing the cities so they aren’t dependent on private cars. NL was also going that way in the 1970s until they changed direction. The best time to do it would have been back then, but the second best time to do it is start now.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who is going to pay? The Canadians who live in the most expensive country in the world and cannot afford to live anymore?

              You guys are ignorant as hell lol

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When the petrol car ban comes in, this could take care of itself as everybody finds themselves priced out of driving.

        We’ll need a really good public transport system to replace it, but we won’t get that either because we’re too poor to care about.

        • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of people are already priced out of driving. We need to be building that public transport network, along with active transport infrastructure and better land use anyway.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            With petrol you can always get a £500 banger, run it into the ground over the next year or two and repeat.

            With electric it starts at about 5000-6000, and you’ll be paying £500 a year just to rent the battery. It’s the batteries that are going to keep that out of reach of the poorest.

            • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              And you still need insurance, fuel etc on top of that, and your £500 banger isn’t going to be very reliable.

              You can get a decent bike for £50 or a bus ticket for £2. The problem is in a lot of the country it isn’t safe to cycle and the buses are shit, so we need to fix those things to have transport that works for everyone (and doesn’t create microplastics).

            • ChromeSkull@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where are you getting this battery rental from? I only knew of Renault and the very first Nissan leafs that did battery lease.

            • MidgePhoto@photog.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              @Blackmist @mondoman712
              I only know of Renault leasing the battery in the Zoe.

              Otherwise, the battery is part of the car and sold as part of it, with a guarantee.

              I think your £500 banger has to be years older than any large number of BEVs, and will cost you more to scrap after you ture of repairing it.

        • MidgePhoto@photog.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Blackmist @mondoman712
          It isn’t a ban, there are huge numbers of them, of which less than a tenth are new any year.

          That tenth of new car buyers can keep last year’s car, or buy a second hand car, but these are new car buyers, they’ll buy a new EV, mostly, or their firm will.

          2,3,4…10 owners down the line, look forward to a used EV coming your way, a couple…10 years after no new petrol cars are made.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s heartening to see that a small change can make such a big difference. Good luck trying to get the Tories to take that message onboard though.

    • richdotward@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was surprised myself, 10p a time adds up. Being so cheap it was easy enough to carry 2 large clothe bags in my backpack everywhere. Saved a fortune over the years over paying for plastic bags.

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly don’t even usually want a bag.

    But it’s the default and I’m too lazy to tell them I don’t need one every time. Making it not the default is plenty.

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is missed in this article is bags for life purchases. We saw the same article more or less in 2019 and once you factored that in there wasn’t much of an improvement in plastic use or disposal. Expect the same to appear after this article at some point.

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A reusable plastic bag only needs to be reused ~40 times before it is better than single use plastic bags. Are people really using them so few times that they can’t hit that?

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        All the data says that no, people are not reusing them.

        Anecdotally, it makes sense. You left your bag in the trunk, or at home, or it turns out you got slightly too many groceries, or you’re staying at a friend’s house and you pop out to get some groceries and don’t have your bag…

        • raptir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well that’s a shame. I guess living in a car-centric region it’s easy for me to just throw them in the trunk so I always have them, but I could imagine if I was taking public transit more often it would be easier to forget them.

          • sizzling@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yup, my bus stop is next to the supermarket and I’ll often pop in on my way home from work to get some stuff I realised I need. I have a big bag full of reusable plastic bags at home now. But I’m glad it is working for many people

      • Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        40 times is fucking wild, I maybe get 5-10 if I really go hard before I forget to bring it one time and have to buy another one

        • raptir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even in that scenario, it’s not like the first one goes away. Now you have two reusable bags.

          • Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Now I have 20+ until I can’t store them any more so I have to throw them out*

            There’s no real way to get rid of surplus bags, that’s the problem. So they just pile up until they go to landfill. If shops let you return bags somehow that would be fantastic.

    • gammasfor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is why I find Keir’s pushback on Khan over ULEZ odd. By the next GE the ULEZ expansion would have been in place for nearly a year and the residents would have gotten over it - based on previous evidence (especially since most of the pushback is based on misinformation about what the scheme will do anyway)

    • Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Self serving checkouts ask you how many bags you want and charge for them in the UK. I have seen a growth in adults using backpacks, it wasn’t the norm before the bag charge.

    • goforliftoff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was in Maine recently and they charge for bags there. At Walmart, the self checkout staff member was also selling bags to the people who needed them, in addition to monitoring everything else that happens at self checkout.

    • sci@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The supermarket close to my home has self checkout, you just have to scan the bag in addition to your products.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Canada we just fully banned plastic bags. Walmart just doesn’t offer any bags at self checkout anymore besides the reusable ones. It’s kind of annoying if you forget to bring bags but it’s not a huge deal. If I’m walking I’ll just fill my personal grocery cart, or if I’m driving I’ll just throw everything loose in my car. If I do need a bag I’ll just spend $0.25 on a reusable bag.

      It’s really not a big deal like a lot of people expected

    • panicnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in a conservative small town. My Walmart no longer even sells one use grocery bags! They had signs up for a couple months before hand.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tesco and Sainsbury’s usually just have the bags at the entrance to the self checkout and you just scan the bag before using it.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have a lot of self-checkouts in the UK - there’s a member of staff on hand to help and they usually dish out bags although in some places you can just grab and scan a bag. If you wanted to not pay for one you could but the staff member and cameras are watching so it isn’t all relying on honesty.

  • astanix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The county north of the one I live in decided to just ban them completely. So the big chain store that used to have free paper or plastic bags switched to charging for the paper bags.

    This seems like such a better idea.

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly don’t even usually want a bag.

    But it’s the default and I’m too lazy to tell them I don’t need one every time. Making it not the default is plenty.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this mean everyone who goes shopping, goes in a car, or do they buy paper bags? and if you are walking there or taking the bus are you not being penalised for not taking the car ?

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure I understand - I often walk to the shops and will stuff a plastic bag or two in my pocket. If I was buying any more than that, I’d be taking the car.

      • mtchristo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather have my plastic bags reused for garbage, than have to always remember to carry around plastic bags, I like to shop after work on my way home. reusing them make them very easy to tear sometime and have to deal with a mess in the middle of the road

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been doing this since they were free (as it seems very wasteful to get new bags each time) and you just get into the habit of always having a bag to hand. It’s not a big deal.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re bags for life. If they’re damaged the cashier will replace it for free.

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The motto “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle” is an order of operations.

          Recycling is great, but avoiding the item in the first place is even better.

        • mortrek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least where I live in the US, the plastic bags that they charge for are usually significantly stronger than the old ones and can easily be reused over and over. Not quite at the level of canvas bags, however.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Call me skeptical, but I seriously doubt the accuracy of these claims. This is the kind of study that the supermarket would pay for to justify their for-profit decision to start charging people for something that has always been free.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well… they’re only counting ‘single use’ plastic bags…

      All supermarket plastic bags now are ‘bag for life’ aka. reusable (I’m not sure what was stopping people reusing the other ones, but that’s the way it’s done) so they don’t count in the statistics.

      So the statistic isn’t useful - I’d like to know the real numbers (including all bags) as I expect there has been a drop, but it isn’t 98%

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thank you! They did the same crap here where they stopped giving away plastic bags and started charging for paper bags which were always free before. Then they put plastic bags in the stores which are like 20x thicker than the previous plastic ones and use way more plastic, and they charge for those now. They’re like “problem solved!”. But nobody actually re-uses those. They just buy new ones every trip. So the outcome is that they stopped giving away thin plastic bags and started selling thick plastic bags, and they think it’s a win. It’s not a win for anything except the grocery store pocketbook. That study is completely pointless like you said. Of course there’s a massive drop of the single use bags if they completely stopped offering the single use bags. But if it’s anything like over here, they’re actually producing more waste now, and costing the consumers money to do so.

        Edited for a bunch of phone typos