• TraumaDumpling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    nuclear take incoming, defcon 5: assassin’s creed 3 was the best in the series and the entire series is pretty ok, like 7/10.

    meltdown take contained behind spoiler

    assassin’s creed 4 was the worst one of the series, the parkour is worse than AC3 for trees and wilderness and every city is like a tiny town with 20 buildings. dual wielding 2 long-ish swords of the same length is stupid, the boats were boring and grindy despite being kinda interesting at first, and despite the fact that the cover shows this you cannot wield both a sword and a flintlock like a real poirate.

    • ashinadash [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I didn’t finish 3 but it didn’t strike me as dramatically different from the others?

      And counterpoint: being a pirate is funny. The climbing is worse but it also hadn’t ever been good to that point; it was kind of okay in AC1 and it declined in quality over the next few games as it moved toward a “just hold right trigger to climb” philosophy. I understand that climbing needed to change from the Prince of Persia method because that kind of system was designed for linear levels and AC needed open worlds, but they started badly and fucked it up worse lol.

      The boats are kind of grindy but I liked them anyway, it was way more interesting than the mandatory side mission bs in the first couple AC games or having to run/horseride across the world to get to it. AC4 was goofy but I was in full support of AC not being its usual dogshit self, tbh.