• elvith@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If it weren’t for those pesky content breaks every now and then, they could serve even more ads. Won’t somebody think of the shareholders?

  • Ismay@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pretty wild to want to add channel when:

    • their interface is garbage
    • their content is pretty lacking

    If they play any “pay for that channel”, it’s insta unsub

    • TK420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m already thinking about it. I can’t watch new content outside the service, so if I’m torrenting for long term storage regardless, why am I paying in the first place?

    • olutukko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      only reason I still have disney+ is because my cousin used to borrow it from me. then I stopped paying for it and he was too lazy to make his own account to he just started paying mine. I’ve had free disney+ for year and a half now

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember the promise that cable TV was paid so you wouldn’t have commercials…it lasted what, 6 months? The channels without commercials cost extra…le sigh

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep. It was pretty clear streaming services were always going to end up the same way from the start. Even YouTube has, although that was harder to predict when it was mostly 30s cat videos.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The predictable backstop of subscription plus the nearly limitless potential upside of ad sales is just too tempting in the long run for media companies. They get to have their cake and eat it too. Spotify, Amazon, Netflix and have all eventually given in, despite insisting they never would. Shareholder owned media companies will always gravitate to this model. It’s the only way to maximize quarterly revenue growth.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I can’t see this sticking. The only people I know who have cable are my Boomer parents. The model is dead.

  • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly this is a nice feature for some kinds of shows. Sometimes I don’t want to watch a show from the beginning in order for certain kinds of shows. The only problem is this feature is coming as streaming services are fracturing and becoming less and less usable.

    • kwebb990@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      ya it seems like a no brainer for streaming services. not sure why it’s being poked fun at. if you dont like the feature you dont have to use it

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not being funny, I actually do love linear programming. I miss the days when I’d just turn on the TV and there’s be a random episode of the Simpsons or King of the Hill, or something with stupidly many episode like one of the thousand Law & Orders.

      Picking something to watch from the beginning is a chore, and now I feel invested if I don’t end up being in the mood. Stuff that’s just “already playing” is something I dreamed of recreating when I started (not)pirating everything. "It started 5 minute ago but this is a good episode " was how I grew up watching TV (and even movies).

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    man, piracy, i mean owning physical media, seems like a better and better method of enjoying media.

    It’s a good thing every show ever has been released on physical media. Right? Right?

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      they hyped up X-Men 97 for months and then didn’t bring it to my region. i don’t even know how there would be copyright issues since it’s an original. they just want me to stop paying and start sailing.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cable is better than streaming in 2024. Like seriously… It’s all in one place, and it’s cheaper than subbing to all the services.

    They finally did it. They ruined streaming.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is pure fantasy. Cable did not have everything in one place for cheaper. Unless you paid extra you only had the default channels where you had to watch everything at a specific time or pay extra for a PVR to record and even then you didn’t have access to entire backlogs of TV shows. If you wanted to watch front to back a show you had to pay $100+ for the box set.

      Also ADs ADs ADs ADs ADs ADs.

      Yeah streaming is getting worse and worse but if you told me I had to choose between cable and a single streaming service I’d pick the streaming service every time.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Streaming is still leagues ahead of cable. Don’t sub to all of them at once (you can only watch one at a time anyways), plus I bet even the ones with ads are still way lighter on them than cable is.

      Plus, as long as these channels don’t replace on demand selection, they don’t make anything worse. It’s just a new way to use the streaming service.

  • Manalith@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If they do it like Paramount I’m all for it. I like just throwing on the Star Trek channel rather than deciding what episode of which series I want to watch. That’s part of why I get so much use out of Plex’s Live TV channels. Only difference is paramount doesn’t have ads on their channels

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have playlists set up in Plex that I use like a TV channel. One’s all [adult swim] cartoons, another is old sci fi, another is just documentaries. Best part is no commercials.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Live TV is handy for sports, but sort of out of date for the modern habit of binge streaming a series.

      I don’t really want to watch TV starting from the middle of an episode in the middle of a series. I’d much rather just jump to where I was in my Dropout queue and start watching whatever show is next in the list.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

        For example, I really enjoyed the episodes of the office that I have watched. It was many years ago and it was only random episodes I caught while airing on TV.

        Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn’t the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

        Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I’d probably enjoy watching it. Might even watch the next episode too.

        With classic TV you also get the feeling that you’re watching the show with others.

        Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it. I’ve seen them all multiple times so I don’t really care where I start. But it’s nice knowing others are having a HP bingeathon with me on a Saturday afternoon. If I was sitting there with my plex server, I could play any HP. But I’m never going to put it on and if I did it would just be me watching the show.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

          Then don’t.

          Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn’t the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

          https://variety.com/lists/the-office-best-episodes-ranked/

          Here’s a list of some of the most popular episodes of the office. I’d probably just pick one of the early seasons and go from there.

          Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I’d probably enjoy watching it.

          Sure. But you can just watch that one straight out. Why simply hope that’s the one Hulu decides to stream at a given moment?

          Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it.

          There’s definitely an appeal to rediscovering old classic movies. But in my experience, the amount of crap out there far outweighs the amount of gold. And the purpose of running channels isn’t to give you a steady diet of quality show. Its to run what’s cheapest to run at any given moment.

          You only start seeing Harry Potter on the Daytime Movie Channel when its completely fallen off people’s radars and the rights are cheaper to acquire.

          You’re far less likely to see Channel 1 having a Harry Potter bingeathon than you are to see them showing Gremlins or Home Alone, because these series are far cheaper to fill non-prime air time with.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They usually are though. Most content (excluding their own) is not available in all regions due to licensing issues.

      • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most content (excluding their own) is not available in all regions due to licensing issues.

        Actually, even including their own for some dumb reason. For instance, Paramount holds the rights to Star Trek, but there’s no way for me to stream some of the shows legally, because Paramount+ isn’t available where I live.

        Which to me makes no sense. It’s just a freaking website, globally accessible, hosting content they own…

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve kinda wished services would do something a bit like this for a while:

    One channel for new stuff, based on your recommendations—just gives you a load of random tastes of shows without you actively picking through things

    One for stuff you rewatch. For example, if you’ve watched always sunny or peep show through a couple of times, put random episodes on this channel for when you just want something in the background

    • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Gonna need some machine learning for this. How much AI in your streaming service are you comfortable with?

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        AI and ML based recommendation engines in streaming services have been a thing for as long as there have been steaming services

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            This sounds like a bit of a slippery slope fallacy, if you’re implying that a steaming service using a recommendation algorithm obviously concludes with sinister personalised AI brainwashing injected into my watching, I think you maybe should watch less black mirror.

            If you didn’t mean that, we’ve been using AI in film and TV for ages now, the latest batch of Star wars films made extensive use of it. Hell, the huge battles in lord of the rings used a rudimentary AI system for governing all the entities in it.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As someone very hesitant about AI I’m comfortable with it. It’s a streaming service, not my email inbox.

        • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          One step further: ai “enhanced” TV shows and movies

          We still good, or you ready to start pitching a fit?

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Amazon did. They kept the price the same, added commercials, then offered to remove the commercials for an additional $4/month.