• YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    No doubt he’ll be straight off to a private job somewhere, raking in millions, despite being less useful than a chocolate teapot. Despite what he says online.

    • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Don’t forget his 115 grand of the taxpayers money that he’ll be getting every year for the rest of his life for "office costs and secretarial costs arising from his special position in public life” as well as severance and a special pension. Pocket change to him of course, but you know he’s going to claim every single penny of it just for the joy of fucking over regular people, and then probably invest it in arms manufacturing or oil and coal companies or private prisons or something else evil like that, as a treat.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was going to say “up to” £115k but it looks like most of them claim as close to the maximum that they think that they can justify.

        I’d have thought that the costs would go down year after year as the financial impact on their lives went down over time. Theresa May’s is going up for some reason and why the hell are Tony Blair, John Major and Gordon Brown still claiming the full amount!?

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        He earned his stripes fucking the poors so now he will be rewarded by the big club for his services.

        Job well done, sucks to suck peasants!

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Sure, but his main motivation isn’t to fuck over the poors as a mercenary for some other asshole’s wealth. It’s to fuck over the poors for his own interest.

          Dude already was a Goldman Sachs banker. There’s not many depths he hasn’t already plumbed.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    5 months ago

    As an American who is absolutely horrified and embarrassed about our own political climate and voter behavior, it’s very good to see a sane and dull transfer of power.

    Sunak’s speech after stepping down:

    Whilst he has been my political opponent, Keir Starmer, will shortly become our prime minister. In this job, his successes will be all our successes, and I wish him and his family well. Whatever our disagreements in this campaign, He is a decent, public spirited man who I respect.

    He and his family deserve the very best of our understanding as they make the huge transition to their new lives behind this door. And as he grapples with this most demanding of jobs in an increasingly unstable world.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      And, like with the US, you now have progressives inheriting a house that conserves shat in for over a decade. Austerity, Brexit, etc.

      I’m curious to see how good Britain’s long term memory is. America forgets about the dangers of conservatism all too quickly.

      • Rekhyt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        So does Britain. Something like 75 of the last 100 years have had Conservatives in power. Obviously, what that means has changed over time, but it’s clear that every time Labour gets a shot at governing, Brits yell “Not good enough!” and put the Tories back in office.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      He didn’t have to do this. It has nothing to do with the transfer of power. Just tradition to run away when you lose but you’re 100% allowed to stay party leader

      • anlumo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not in UK’s Conservative Party. They don’t mess around, if the leader doesn’t deliver, they’re out, no questions asked.

        • jeffw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Except it has nothing to do with vacating Downing St and the transition of power

    • tlou3please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep our country is screwed in many ways but at least we haven’t so far dabbled in that kind of madness. It is fundamentally a properly functioning democracy.

  • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like the UK is lagging behind and we will see a rubber banding effect. After a decade of cons we will see a weak centrist labour party that will try to right the wrongs of the previous government while also taking all the blame for it. Then come next election cycle, because they were too pussyfoot to change FPTP, a stronger than ever right wing party will undo anything.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The FPTP system in the UK is what makes this incredibly likely. Yes labour won huge with their Tory lite platform, but turnout was shit and their huge majority win isn’t even 35 percent of the people who even bothered voting. That’s a very fragile landslide and it will turn around when these milquetoast liberals fail to change anything (because they don’t want to change anything).

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, FPTP is a shitty system and needs to be changed. But it’s disconcerting to consider how many hard right Reform MPs we’d have now if we had proportional representation.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          To be sure, but with actual labour supporters looking at that and thinking “it’s because Tories didn’t actually keep their promises to stop immigration” and “let’s opress trans people too” I honestly don’t think the resulting government with a few more in opposition would’ve been worse than something where an actual left party might’ve succeeded. You know, one that provides a revolutionary vision of hope.

          “I do think people need hope, but it needs to be what I call ordinary hope, realistic hope,” Starmer said.

          https://inthesetimes.com/article/britain-keir-starmer-corbyn-election-serious

          This government is doomed.

      • dignick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Labour got less votes than 2019. What a landslide! I’m not sure their Tory lite platform did them any favours. They were just Not The Tories and reform split the Tory vote because they were also Not The Tories and promised that everything would be perfect if we just hate immigrants a bit more

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Unfortunately we won’t get proper socialists after that, we’ll get fascists.

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Obviously not feeling remotely sorry for him, but it makes me laugh when other MPs pile on the prime minister for their losses.

    Like… it’s all of you fuckers that have done this over the past 14 years. Rishi was part of that as well, but Conservatives had already lost by the time he became PM.

    • mecfs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah don’t get me wrong Rishi was absolute shit, but the man was an upgrade compared to Truss and BoJo

      • muse@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Unless you’re trans, then he was the first prime minister to openly mock and ridicule you and your ilk

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I enjoyed his leadership pledges. He wanted to fix the economy he screwed up as chansoler

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      We really need to be able trigger by-elections for nonperformance, he’s still an MP after all. Fall below minimum attendance at the commons and can’t prove it’s because you’re doing constituency work and a recall petition should be triggered.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    Pretty standard move in Parliamentary Politics.

    I bet Truss, Sunak and their ilk with find lots of work as talking heads on American and British conservative shows.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That outfit looks like it was purchased by a stylist and the tags were removed just before taking this picture. “Make sure you pull up the sleeves so it looks like you’re hard working!”

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Depressing that the UK clearly still wants a conservative government, they’ve just, after 14 years, finally realized the Tories are incompetent perverts.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    If only leaders could step down before the inevitable loss for the good of their voters and their party… Cough Biden… Cough Trudeau… Cough

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      UK doesn’t work like you think it does. The PM is not a publicly elected position like in the USA.

      You vote for the party. The winning party tells you who, of their elected members, will have that role. The party can replace the PM on a vote.

      it’s like the speaker of the house in the USA. Remember all the voting and stuff the Republicans did earlier? Similar.

      • Rekhyt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is exactly right - the exact same “Let’s burn down the system sell off the system to the highest briber bidder” sentiment that’s been ruling the Republicans has been eating away at the Tories as well. Now, every time leadership fails to make changes, they toss them out and put someone more extreme in their place (until you hit a Liz Truss)

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah I’m Canadian, our system works fairly similarly. We vote liberal or conservative, but the leader can be different depending on the party vote.

        Our Trudeau could still decide to not run for PM next election though if he decided not to run.

        Your party can’t tell you to lead the party if you weren’t voted in as part of that party since you didn’t run at all.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Then you end up with Boris, Truss, Sunaak in a single parliament and then wondering why your party is seen as being incapable of selecting anyone decent and then a crushing electoral defeat.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    But he’s their best leader ever. Labour has not been this strong since I’ve been following uk politics.

    • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Labour were like 1% point better than 2019. The only difference was the collapse of SNP, and the collapse of the Tory nationalist vote that ran to Reform.

      Labour just walked the ball into the open net.

      • anlumo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        At least they managed to do that, unlike the center-left in other European countries.

        • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not sure it’s centre left.

          They campaigned on being hard on immigration and not increasing taxes to increase spending.

          Keir has been quite deceptive and dropped all the policies he claimed in the leadership. He could be more right wing than Blair. So probably center right. The right wing of the party took over. Funded by business.

        • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Corbyn, and no. He got 40% in 2017. Keir only 34% here. When the right wing turned on him, including Streeting and his Progress chums on countless occasions there isn’t a lot you can do.

          The right of the Labour party won’t tolerate a left wing party, but the left wing are much more professional, despite treatment of Abbot, Corbyn and others joining strikes.