• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    The abstract does a poor job of explaining one of the primary motivations of this research: if Alcubierre drives can exist, and can be built, then it seems likely a sufficiently advanced alien species would have built them. We could therefore find them by detecting the drive failures associated with the hypothetical tech, something which is likely easier than actually building the drives ourselves.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Won’t it be funny if it turns out WE’RE the most advanced alien species? Like, we’re out here wasting time with SETI and this failed warp drive thing, when we should be concentrating on UNIVERSE DOMINATION!!!

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        This is an actual proposed solution to the Fermi Paradox. We’re still relatively early on a universal scale. It’s possible we’re just… first. Or so early that hardly anybody else is out there yet. Could be that a billion years later, advanced life is all over the place.

        In your formulation, we would also be the explanation for another species’ dark forest hypothesis…

        • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Personally I find this very probable:

          First, the big bang happens and stars are made

          Then a star large enough to fuse heavier elements needs to live its full life then die of a supernova to create elements heavier than iron

          Lastly those remnants need to form a new solar system with a planet somewhat rich in these heavier elements to support life, as well as the time needed to have life spring up in the first place

          In terms of how long all of these take, we’re pretty young cosmically

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        While possible, it goes against the Mediocrity principle:

        The idea is to assume mediocrity, rather than starting with the assumption that a phenomenon is special, privileged, exceptional, or even superior.[2][3]

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Everything is mediocre

          Everything is blah, when you’re part of a team

          Everything is mediocre

          When you’re living in-between (the narrow ends of the Bell curve)