For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Discord is not a good replacement for support forums. Discord isn’t searchable by search engines.

    Historically, if I had an issue with a product and I googled “[product] [issue]” I’d be met with a support forum post, with someone describing the same issue. I could read the thread to find how they resolved it. I don’t actually have to interact with the post at all, and I don’t need to ask the same question again. For most (decent) forums I don’t even need to make an account just to read the post.

    Discord throws that all out the window. Now I’m met with a “JoiN OUr dIScoRd SerVEr to GEt suPPorT” page. Nothing is searchable via a search engine. And Discord’s server searchability (even in the app) has always been, at best, absolute dogshit. You already need to know exactly which text thread things were posted in, (because you can’t search the entire server at once), and you need to know exactly what was said, (because there’s no fuzzed search terms).

    So 99% of the time, you just end up asking the same question that has already been asked a hundred times in the past, and now you need to wait for someone to respond. It also puts a lot more strain on the support staff, because they’re answering the same question a hundred times instead of just the once in a forum.

    And don’t come at me with the “but Discord recently added a support forum feature where people can start threads and save the conversation for later” bullshit. That’s a band-aid, at best. It still isn’t searchable via search engines, so it means the above issues with Discord’s search function still apply, and the forum function is essentially useless as support forums.

    Lastly, why the fuck should I be forced to join another server just to get support? What if I don’t have a discord account? What if I live in a region that Discord doesn’t support? What if I just plain don’t want to clog up my server sidebar with dozens of servers that I have only visited once? What if I just really hate the fact that your server has been configured to push notifications for every single message by default? What if I just fucking want to google my issue, and get an answer without any further effort?

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      And that’s assuming they even have a support staff. Most of the time I see this bullshit, it’s small dev teams maintaining niche software with less than the bare minimum of documentation.

      The only problem I have with your stance is that it’s not petty, pointless nor pedantic. It’s a plague on the world of software. Discord is terrible for the use-case it’s intended for (group chats), why the fuck are people using it for their community forums???

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d argue that this is petty, because you’re still technically able to get support for your issue in the end. It just takes a lot more effort in everyone involved; More effort on your end to actually get support, and more effort on support staff because they have already answered your question a hundred times further up the thread.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it were supposed to be pronounced “jif” it would have been spelled that way, I don’t give two fucks what Stephen Wilhite said about it either.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same with Gnome wanting to be pronounced “Gah-nome”, or Latex “Latech”. Just spell stuff the way you want it to be pronounced, or accept that people pronounce it another way

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        or Latex “Latech”. Just spell stuff the way you want it to be pronounced

        But they did! You’re the one who fucked it up by using an “x” (Latin letter x) instead of a “χ” (Greek letter chi).

        (Also, you didn’t capitalize or format it correctly. It’s supposed to be rendered as “LAΤΕΧ”, and yes, those last three letters are Τ Ε Χ Greek capital tau, epsilon, chi.)

        🤓

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If it were meant to be pronounced ‘giff’ as in ‘goober’, it would have been spelled that way. You decide to turn an initialism into an acronym, you get what you get.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It always WAS an acronym. That’s the entire point of the argument. "G"raphics "I"nterchange "F"ormat.

        Nobody turned it into an acryonym, it just IS an acronym. That’s not an opinion, it’s a fact. The reason it’s pronounced with a hard G is because Graphics is a hard G.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        English being a bad language doesn’t excuse incorrect pronunciations. And if your argument was to hold any water, it’d be pronounced jraphics.

        • satanmat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wikipedia says. ʒI: where “ʒ” is the S in pleasure or the g in beige

          Which is to say (smoking my pipe like oxford don) I was making a scatological joke.

          Shitter

          • Maeve@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s fine, it’s just hard to know without hearing native speakers’ pronunciations and you’ve only read it. Thanks for the reply!

    • 1337@1337lemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      this one also makes me irritated in general when I see it happen and sometimes angry when I find out a special moment was only captured via vertical video. Cell phones are amazing portable devices, not the end means of consuming media.

      I have an ultra wide monitor at work and giant TVs in half the rooms in my house. 92% of the media I watch is on a landscape screen and the other 8% I’m pooping

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The word “literally” has been forever ruined by people who use it to mean “figuratively.” Worse, there is now literally no way to actually convey the original meaning of the word “literally” in a concise, clear way.

    You have to say something like, “A is literally 10 times bigger than B…and I mean that ACTUALLY literally.” And then people will STILL assume that you’re speaking figuratively.

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Try using “precisely” or “roughly” where applicable. It lets people know you’re talking about firm realities and aren’t using hyperbole.

      It’s a stupid, imperfect workaround and I hate that it’s necessary, but it’s the best we have for a decade or three until people stop bastardizing “literally”.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There literally-literally is.

      And to over-egg that particular pudding point, word doubling might be a common thing in “simpler” languages and, ahem, pooh-poohed in “complex” ones, but that second “literally” restores the original meaning.

      For now.

      Until some bright spark starts using “literally literally” to mean “figuratively” anyway.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s how language works.

      Many words shifted meaning over time, some gained connotation, some lost it, some turned to something completely different.

      Just look at the word “gay”, it shifted from “happy” to “haha homosexuals are outwardly happy, so we call them gay semi-ironically” to “homosexual”. The homophobic connotation was added, then the original meaning got lost.

      You can complain, sure, but just read an old text from the 17th century and try to find a sentence that means exactly the same today as it did back then.

      • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m fine with language evolving; my issue is that there used to be a word that succinctly conveyed a particular idea, and now there is no way to concisely convey that idea in English.

        “Gay” changing its meaning isn’t the same thing, because there are still plenty of ways of saying “happy” in English.

  • medgremlin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The medical symbol of the staff with the snake is only supposed to have 1 (one) snake on it. A staff with 1 snake is the Rod of Asclepius (the son of Apollo and Greek demigod of medicine), a staff with 2 snakes is a Caduceus which is carried by Hermes as a messenger or herald.

    Physicians get 1 snake. Couriers and heralds get 2 snakes. Any medical professional or organization that uses 2 snakes is wrong and needs to go study the humanities and classics for a bit.

    • Similarly, the Shamrock, (☘️) an important symbol for Saint Patrick’s Day has three leaves where most SPD kitch sold in the US features four-leaf clovers (🍀) an unrelated good luck symbol. I dont object because I feel Ireland needs a better iconic saint (and a better holiday) than the guy who brought the imperialist religion under which the native Irish would be subjugated.

      They need someone like Joan of Arc who ran the English out (of settlements in France).

  • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If something’s rate of hype is too fast for my internal meter, I will become immediately skeptical of the trend/show/etc. and not care about it, solely because everyone is caring about it too much and too fast.

  • verity_kindle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    “white chocolate” doesn’t exist. It’s just sugar and a little bit of cocoa butter. It’s edible wax. It’s not chocolate and it doesn’t belong in any assortment of sweets, ever. Cocoa butter is skin moisturizer and that’s it.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It provably does exist. And it’s delicious. I could go to the supermarket and buy some right now. Except I’m fat and trying to lose weight.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It does exist in the way that chocolate ‘solids’ exist as an element of chocolate. A typical chocolate bar consists of both chocolate solids and cocoa butter. It’s still an element of what you’re eating,

      So just cuz you eat ‘chocolate’ because you think you only favor the solids, you’re still eating the butter too in what makes chocolate. It’s like drinking milk products and then getting pedantic over people who use butter as a food even though milk contains some the same elements.

      But again this is about stupid hills to die on. And you picked an intolerant and ignorant stance so I guess you technically win in this particular topic.

  • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I hate hate hate when people try to discredit a theory because “it’s a theory not a fact” as if the label of “fact” exists on some kind of science ladder for an idea. “Facts” is a colloquial word like any other, it’s not some special category above theories.

    Moreover, the most tried and tested theories are facts. Science rarely just disproves an established theory outright. Einstein’s General Relatively equations reduces into Newton’s Laws of Motion in most situations. Newton’s Laws of Motion weren’t “wrong”, it’s just General Relatively is more specific and accurate.

    The Scientific Method usually just builds on what already exists without claiming we were all unfactual for working with what we had.

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s concrete, not cement. (Sidewalks for example, or foundations of buildings, etc)

    Cement is an ingredient in concrete.

  • Applesauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    When people say ‘I could care less’. I know what they mean, but it is absolutely not what they said. I hate it even more when I hear it in a song or a TV show/movie. That tells me it made its way past a whole slew of writers and editors. I hate it. It’s ‘I couldn’t care less’. COULDN’T!!! Like you care so little that you couldn’t care any less.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Spectacle Fighter”.

    In the late aughts, game critic Ben “Yathzee” Croshaw came up with that term to describe games like Bayonetta and Devil May Cry, beat-em-up type games where the point is less “can you get through” and more “how high can you get that combo meter? How COOL can you make yourself look while beating up all these fodder enemies?”

    A few years later the industry coalesced on an agreed-upon term for this subgenre – And called it “Character Action”.

    Yathzee has just accepted defeat and uses the term everyone uses, he has to, he works in games media.

    I refuse. Character Action is a dumb, DUMB term because every action game is a character action game, because there is ACTION and CHARACTERS in all of them.

    Whereas “Spectacle Fighter” was perfectly descriptive of just WHAT made those games special. You are FIGHTING, and the objective is to LOOK SPECTACULAR.

    • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I haven’t heard that term before, but it’s way better than character action. Plus, it actually fits for games that use similar mechanics but are technically different genres, like ULTRAKILL.

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    To streamers, YouTubers, etc. Your Patreon supporters are called Patrons. Not fucking “Patreons.”