• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think it’d be subverting expectations. From the start you might think it’s about the Pacific trash island that has collected there, but then it turns the other way and calls Puerto Rico a trash island. A decently funny joke imo, even if rude. I’ve seen the same joke being done about the UK and it did get a proper chuckle out of me.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The main difference is that the UK used to be powerful and did a lot of bad things to a lot of countries around the world. Puerto Rico on the other hand has always been weak so it feels weird for someone in a much more powerful area of the world to pick on them.

      • cpw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        2 months ago

        Good comedy can punch up, but very rarely works when punching down. Punching down is generally just bullying in disguise.

          • Karjalan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Jeselnik is a class act. What’s interesting to me is that the guy in the op, essentially has the same Roast style as Jeselnik. But the way they execute it is key.

            I saw some of the ops bits from a comedy central roast, and they were really funny… But when you put him in the context of being at a trump rally wave saying stuff like this it’s like “ohhh, you’re not making subvertive jokes, you’re just a bigot hiding behind ‘comedy’”

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It can be meaner but for a stand-up I think it could be fine, if the context is comedy and it didn’t have genuine hatred behind it. In this case it’s clear that it was used as a tool of hatred and not just for making a joke.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think how places used to be plays any part in how funny insulting them is. Despite being as powerful as the UK when it was last relevant and worse, I think people would still be offended if he said Japan instead. “Always OK to hate colonizers” as someone put it my butt, the internet just really wants to make fun of France and not feel bad about it.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would say it is fair to make fun of them as long as they themselves still glorify that past.

          • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            So you would say it’s fair if he had said “It’s called Japan” instead? They glorify their recent past as well.

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              If by recent past you mean the genocides in their most recent wars with their neighbors then yes, I would say that would qualify them to be made fun of in that way. If you just mean some industrial successes in the 1980s, not so much.