I’ve read and pondered your collective input from the other rule vote.

I wanted to gauge the community consensus on AI content in general on Shirts That Go Hard. Should we allow AI generated content to be posted here?

Please vote here >>> strawpoll.com/B2ZB9jYQjgJ


Poll is closed and here is the final results.

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Curious about an edge case: what about photos of real shirts that have obvious AI content printed on them? My vote would still be to not allow it.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Edit: Oops, misread that comment. Was thinking AI on the photo of a real shirt instead of AI on the real shirt.

      I’d reluctantly allow it, but it would be less likely to get an upvote from me if I can tell.

      There would still not be a real shirt having that content, so what would be the point?

      I feel the same about human drawn or edited shirts - unless someone actually created it physically then it’s just an idea and not a shirt that goes hard.

      • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        If someone goes through the trouble of ordering/printing it, buyin/selling it, and wearing it, at that point I’d consider it a real shirt.

        • davidgro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Oh! I misinterpreted the top-level comment, and was thinking of a photo of a (possibly blank) real shirt that later had AI stuff added to the photo.

          Hmm. A real shirt with AI Slop on it would indeed be a corner case, I guess it would count, but it’d only upvote if it goes Very hard.