Then pull back with Scorpion line: Get over here!

I could joke out of this, but why the hell. Yeah, by my best account I will still be here afterwards also. And we could use this brief moment to make what comes next better than current prognosis of “nothing good, lad”

Great point, thank you:)

So… not intelligent. In the sense that when someone without enough knowledge of computers and/or LLMs hears “LLM is intelligent” and sees “an LLM tells me X”, they will be likely to believe that X is true, and not without a reason. Exactly this is my main reason against all the use of intelligence-related terms. When spoken by knowledgeable people who do know the difference - yeah, I am all for that. But first we need to cut the crap of advertisement and hype

If something external defines my best interests, I am a fool. Thank you for the link, will definitely watch it

What have you done, a cruel person. Also, take my upvote

Just get a chip from a hotel room, and you’ll have all the eddies you’l ever need, I promise

Every day, he-he

Or more violence directed at those who deserve it. Will make things more bearable for a brief moment

Yup. I am having hard time (decades already) facing this reality. It is ugly as hell (any hell, for that matter)

Dafuck are you talking about?

Count me in

Why not get them fired? Call me cruel anyone who feels like it, but leaving no sign of what has been done is just plain shit attitude to colleagues

Well, if we are not looking at all the disaster the hype is doing on so many levels (which is fine in the sense that technology and fools are different things), I draw the line at… intelligence, not simulation of hardware. I care lot less if something before me runs on carbon, metal or, say, sulfur than I care if it is intelligent

And as someone has already pointed out, even defining intelligence is damn hard, and different intelligence works differently (someone who is great at moving their body, like dancers or martial artists, is definitely more intelligent than me in quite a few areas, even if I know math or computers better than them). So… “artificial intelligence” as a bunch of algorithms (including LLM) etc - no problem with me, “artificial intelligence” as “this thing is thinking” or “this thing is just as good as a human artist/doctor/lawyer” - nah, bullshit

Wow, do I wholeheartedly thank you for this. Yes, we need something better, and I want to see more of “I think this will work better than what we have, because…”, and not “I think capitalism is bad”. Me personally would have started not with the system but people, buut as long as every aspect of life is going to eventually taken care of, bottom-up or top-down way of getting there does not really matter

Well, Arch wiki explicitly tells you are expected to read the page before doing an update. Those distros which claim to be user-friendly as in “we treat you with kids gloves” definitely should take care of this, no questions here

Yup, it really is not. Those plenty of people are doing a big disservice to others with such proposing. I am sad to hear it

Where did you get the idea that Arch is a daily driver for regular user? The very distro that tells in big letters: stuff can break, you better watch out on updates? The very distro that has command-line install process with chroot-like commands as official one?

This can’t be stressed enough

Now that is worth being scared of. Thank you