• Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hilariously enough my city’s “woke” government is actually in the process of banning little free libraries because “they are on public easements without a permit.”

    They are also building a permitting process, but only allowing non profits to apply for the permits.

    American Governments are hilarious

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Those are two different skills, so yeah that’s probably true. Kelly comics have intentionally bad art but it’s acrually generally a bit too good and shows he’s faking the style of the real untalented hacks. His recurring characters are on model each time. I learned a lot of how to draw from copying and tracing cartoon and comic characters. Calvin and Hobbes specially. If you use thin loose leaf and a bright overhead light you can usually trace over darker lines from a page underneath and just feeling out how the lines work and stuff by doing so can help, then go for free hand copying. Do that over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over with gradually more and more realistic stuff while also learning formal techniques, anatomy and also fucking around and free drawing and doodling you will get there. Persistence gets your technique down and patience allows you to execute effective, you gotta tske your time and while I wouldn’t say there are no shortcuts cause there are, you can only take rm once you know the hard way.

  • gramxi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    I walk by a handful of little free libraries on the way to work and I’ve never seen any books taken out. They honestly seem like slightly more elaborate “IN THIS HOUSE” lawn signs.

    • itappearsthat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      They are basically not self-sustaining. People will use them as places to dump actual literal trash books out of some misplaced belief that destroying books is wrong so they’re doing good by passing it along. Actual good books will be taken. So they deteriorate monotonically over time, therefore whenever you walk by one it’s a near certainty that all the books are entirely garbage.

      • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a given that if you operate one you will likely be on your own to provide books and stock it. Granted it depends where you live. I used to help facilitate one and it seemed to get a ton of traffic… Some visitors would take 5+ books and bring nothing in return. Sometimes somebody would donate dozens. Most people who commit to operating one of these know they will go into their own pocket to stock the thing. Thrift stores often have books for 50 cents. It’s probably worth the investment in the community. For me its kinda the least I could do.

    • SSJ2Marx [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      A neighbor of mine has one and it actually got used as intended when they first put it up, but I feel like once the novelty wears off they’re just so limited in scope that they become a lawn decoration.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      His books definitely err towards a sort of fash-adjacent libertarian moral. Like I can probably sum up at least half of them with “the based chad maverick scientist comes in and saves the day from the ineptitude of weak soy government/corporate establishment scientists, with his rugged basic common sense and some catch that Crichton thought sounded clever.”

      • SSJ2Marx [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s funny that in his most famous book by far the libertarian capitalist completely screws the pooch by trying to save money, gets eaten alive by his own creation, and in the end the government has to save the day with napalm (though they don’t get everything and the Amazon is undeniably screwed forever after the end of the book).

        • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Think about it: the decadent soy corporate scientists caused the problem and endangered everyone for money, while the rugged manly scientist who digs in the dirt and wears a cowboy hat saves the day. The book he wrote about nanomachines was pretty much the same: weak corporate scientists make the problem by being naive and soy, the manly outsider engineer who got screwed over by a manager who was selling secrets to China comes in and saves the day with a flamethrower.

          It’s all entirely in line with how libertarians can sometimes see that corporations are bad, but they focus on the dumbest shit like the corporation not being publicly racist enough or letting women be managers sometimes.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honest question - Is any curation of these tantamount to censorship? Note that the free libraries are often geared toward kids.

    If you operated a free library and someone put Mein Kampf in there, would you leave it or remove it?

    How about the Anarchists Cookbook?

    Old copies of Penthouse?

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d remove it and whether it’s censorship or not doesn’t really apply because it’s a free library and I can take whatever book I want from it and if I choose to burn it or shred it for use in a hamster cage than I can. I’ll censor those who want to spread hateful or pornographic material in my neighborhood if it’s left in a public book box like that. But personal censorship just means like, yknow doing that or tearing down flyers you don’t want around etc. I guess if a government were to do it it would count as censorship but they’d probably just get rid of the whole free library box under some zoning law or whatever.

      This is a really reddit question. Part of my free speech is being able to counter other people’s speech and a way of doing that is physically removing it from public space.

    • SSJ2Marx [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I had one I would definitely curate it to general audiences, which means none of the above. But I’m not against censorship on principal so

    • IMF_DOOM [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      imo removing anything from the little library is censorship but anyone who has a problem with censoring nazi propaganda aimed at children is either actually a nazi sympathiser of some kind or so utterly abstracted from any real consequences of nazi ideology that they feel fine sitting in libertarian subreddits or whatever and complaining that Nazi’s need to have their god given right to incite pogroms

    • DokPsy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Depends on how many stains are on the pages. And that goes for the cookbook and penthouse too