cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/3804525
Wow, things have changed since I last posted in /c/fediverse. Here are the top five most active instances based on monthly active users:
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/3804525
Wow, things have changed since I last posted in /c/fediverse. Here are the top five most active instances based on monthly active users:
Total lemmy comments: 4,256,302
Total Hexbear comments: 3,710,000
Total hexbear comments: 3,710,000
Hexbear comments with more than just one emoji/picture: 100,000
😔
source?
facts don’t care about your feelings sweetie, hexbear.net has more real engagement than any other instance, sorry your bot posters don’t count!
I’m pretty sure that was a joke, lol
Absolutely baited
Chapos are efficient. Why post a paragraph when one big emoji works?
An emoji is worth a thousand words.
:shaka-walls-fell:
I would’ve guessed 20x more.
We love our emotes
Hexbear comments that aren’t related to politics: 0
Who hurt you?
Imagine thinking pop culture, technology, and news, 95% of what gets discussed in any Lemmy instance, aren’t related to politics.
Hexbear comments which would fail freshman political science: yes
Ad hominum
Stawman fallacy
Slippery slope fallacy
Appeal to authority fallacy
Hexbear comments which can’t take a joke: one or more
Average “I like to act stoopid to get gotcha moment” internet user
Weren’t you ome of the people we asked a bunch of Marxism 101 questions to without any response?
No, I think it was the opposite. I’m the one who keeps insisting that socialist philosophy doesn’t stop in 1924, that the socialist international is not a Leninist organization, and that MLs who quote Chomsky in defense of autocratic politics are way more fucking dense than any lib.
Y’all are the ones who treat Lenin’s half baked, modernist screed like some cringeworthy dogma painted on your cave wall, while continuously demonstrating that you are mostly slacktivists, trolls and keyboard warriors who express no actual interest in political philosophy beyond your painfully outmoded geopolitical head canon, yet go around mocking others for not finding your stick drawings very convincing.
Okay, so you would be willing to explain some basic marxist ideas to the viewer then?
Great!
How do fixed capital, ttotroptf, and the primary mode of worker alienation under capital intersect?(As described by Marx and not successfully criticized up to the present day) This has multiple answers and one of them can be a one word answer.
That out of the way, on a personal note;
I work on two different grassroots campaigns because a nearby hospital is closing and the lead pipes are poisoning the community’s children. I am heading up internal reorganization to make my org safer, and am donating most of my salary from my bullshit job that lets me post and organize for most of the day to socialist orgs, while surviving as a multiracial trans woman in a rural area of a deep red state. I’m currently reading socialist and anarchist texts written in the last 5 years, on hiatus from reading a book about the soviet dual monetary system because it is machine translated from Russian and is a slog.
I have more respect for the least educated hexbear slacktivists than I do for anti-communist “socialists” like yourself.
Log the fuck off and start from the basics again, because you’ve obviously misunderstood them based on all the dogshit takes I’ve seen from you. All the anarcho syndies I know who actually do shit would not get along with your sorry ass.
Yeah buddy, I’m not your monkey. If you want to have an actual conversation about why, eg, autocracy doesn’t do jack shit to resolve exploitation via labor alienation and commodification, I’m here for it. Or if you want to go over why the complete lack of actionable framework for curating the political agency of the individual is, in fact, one of the most glaring and widely discussed holes in Marxist orthodoxy, I’d love to pull that string.
But if you are just going to be another smug sectarian who insists on making dishonest campist garbage the bottom of their moral well, then I guess we can keep taking pot shots at eachother. I just think the internet deserves a better class of socialist.
sounds like you are transforming into a corn cob
I’m sure you can definitely answer it, mhmm. Very believable.
This demonstrates a lack of basic knowledge of theory as well as data on how AES have developed their workplaces.
But who knows, might be wrong. What did you read that lead you to this conclusion?
Who is an orthodox marxist though? Also, youre going to have to define individual agency if you dont think AES states don’t cultivate it.
Literally in a left unity instance, you’re the one claiming the vast majority of socialists throughout the world are bad when you claim they’re all autocratic.
Just couldnt help it, huh?
I passed my polisci class
Hell yea, proud to fail the liberal far left cultural Marxist CRT bullshit that is being taught in university political science classes
I can’t tell how many layers of irony this is except that it is an odd number
Reddit
Rhebus posting is what the youth do now. Get with the times gramps
holy fuckin sheeeit lmfaooo
Removed by mod
live ghoul reactionThey’re worth a whole lot more than you, anyway
LoL… You wish
I wish you had better comebacks than that, anyway, because that was pathetic. And that you weren’t a transphobic shithead, but I try to be realistic.
Hog out or log out, nazi pig
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
oh fuck off
Removed by mod
Yes. Now post a picture of your hog.
Singular they goes back at least as far as Shakespeare. Also, “you” was originally a plural pronoun.
Cant “you” still be used to mean many people? “do you all” “you guys” etc…
Also, there’s a lot of Shakespeare speech that is kind of incomprehensible today.
Yes, it can, but my point was that it used to only mean multiple people and we don’t have any trouble using it to refer to just one
yeah like thou for the second person singular is pretty odd… wait a second
I don’t think anyone is suggesting that we eliminate the plural “they”, either.
If Shakespeare’s English is too hard to comprehend today, then we can make it easier by switching one part back. It also proves that they’re ;-) not just trying to sound more important or whatever transphobic bs.